Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Germen/Prejudices about islam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Eugene van der Pijll 22:45, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- THIS IS A PAGE IN USER-SPACE
Totally inappropriate use of user space - Wikipedia is not a political discussion forum. Serious POV issues, etc.
- Delete ~~~~ ( ! | ? | * ) 18:54, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Let them do what they want in their subspaces. Seems a bit like bad faith to VfD someones page... I hope you at least told them first. Redwolf24 20:44, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep POV and other normal deletion criteria are completely irrelevant in user space. -Soltak 21:48, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I personally don't have an issue with this user's decision to post this content, but Wikipedia:User_page makes it obvious that this is not what user pages are for. The Extensive discussion not related to Wikipedia and Opinion pieces not related to Wikipedia or other non-encyclopedic material clauses in the What should I avoid? section apply here.- Thatdog 22:27, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]- Comment - Objection, it IS related to Wikipedia, it's an archive of one of his posts to talk:islamophobia. Xaa 22:38, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- My apologies, I was not aware of the source of this page. I am changing my vote to Keep per Xaa. - Thatdog 22:51, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Objection, it IS related to Wikipedia, it's an archive of one of his posts to talk:islamophobia. Xaa 22:38, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Germen is entitled to his POV in his userspace. David | Talk 22:31, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, Insisting someone be NPOV in their own user space? Ummm... I don't think that's possible. While I acknowledge that wikipedia policy does allow user pages to be VfD'ed, I do not think that action is necessary or appropriate in this case. This is an archive of a reply that Germen had posted to the talk:Islamophobia page, I see no reason why he should not be allowed to archive his comments on one of his sub-pages. Xaa 22:33, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, not obviously inappropriate. Gazpacho 23:28, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, does not meet the criteria required for deletion. Hall Monitor 23:29, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, user space has enough latitude to allow something like this (in fact, I can see an article emergin in future, or contributions to other articles). And -Ril-, just leave user space alone, VfDing it will not achieve much. -Splash 01:47, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep. This is a stupid VfD. Nandesuka 16:51, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep ObsidianOrder 11:58, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.